Yamahai and Kimoto sake. What are the differences?

Yamahai and Kimoto are both traditional methods of brewing sake, the iconic Japanese rice wine, and they share similarities but also have distinct differences in their production processes and the resulting flavour profiles. Both methods are older and more labor-intensive compared to the modern, quicker sokujo method, which has become the standard due to its efficiency and control.

Kimoto Method

The Kimoto method is the older of the two traditional techniques, originating in the late 1600s. It involves a painstaking process to create the yeast starter, known as "moto," which is crucial for fermentation. The key characteristic of the Kimoto method is the preparation of the moto without adding lactic acid. Instead, brewers rely on naturally occurring lactic acid bacteria to prevent unwanted bacteria from proliferating. This is achieved through a process called "yama-oroshi," where the rice mash is vigorously pounded using wooden poles. (In Akita, the sake often uses the 'Akita Kimoto' method which uses an electric auger to mix the sake, like a mixer). This labour-intensive step (both poles and augers) helps to mash the rice and mix the ingredients thoroughly, promoting the growth of desirable lactic acid bacteria.

The Kimoto process is time-consuming and requires great skill and labor, typically resulting in a robust sake with higher acidity and a complex, umami-rich flavuor profile. Sakes produced using the Kimoto method are often described as having a deeper, sometimes wilder character.

Yamahai Method

The Yamahai method, a variation of the Kimoto method, was developed around 1909. The main difference between Yamahai and Kimoto is the omission of the yama-oroshi process. In the Yamahai method, the moto is also left to ferment naturally, but without the physical pounding of the rice. This change was introduced to save labor and time. By not mashing the rice manually, the fermentation process is slower and more irregular, but it still allows natural lactic acid bacteria to dominate and protect the mash.

Sakes made via the Yamahai method typically exhibit a similar flavor profile to those made by the Kimoto method, including high levels of acidity and umami, but they can also have a slightly more pronounced wildness and a richer texture. Yamahai sakes are often described as bold and gamey, with a complexity that can vary greatly depending on the specific techniques of the brewery.

Flavor Profile and Pairing

Both Kimoto and Yamahai sakes tend to have richer, more robust flavours compared to those made with the modern sokujo method. They pair well with hearty, flavorful dishes like grilled meats, stews, and strong cheeses, making them versatile for diverse culinary experiences.


In summary, the main difference between Kimoto and Yamahai sake lies in the production method, specifically whether the yama-oroshi process is used. Kimoto involves this laborious, physical pounding, while Yamahai omits it, leading to subtle variations in flavour and texture. Both methods yield sakes with deeper, more complex flavours than the more streamlined sokujo method. These traditional sakes are cherished for their unique characteristics and the artisanal craftsmanship they represent.

Leave a comment

All comments are moderated before being published